Back in September, we posted our rankings of historical Division 1-A football programs - see http://baggaleyfootball.blogspot.com/2010/09/ranking-programs.html. At the time, the rankings were based on 40 years of historical data - back through 1970. We've added 9 years of historical data (back through 1961) and updated the rankings following the 2010 season - meaning now the rankings are based on 50 years of historical data. Of course, the biggest changes came about as a result of the season just completed, since recent success is weighted greater than historical success. If we were to add the previous 50 years (back through 1911), all of those 50 additional years combined would only have a 16% impact on the resulting rankings. With that explanation, here are how the various Division 1-A programs rank following the 2010 season, taking into account the past 50 years of football history.
1. Ohio State Buckeyes - 0.891150832
2. Florida Gators - 0.877670863
3. Nebraska Cornhuskers - 0.853544602
4. Florida State Seminoles - 0.852293552
5. Oklahoma Sooners - 0.850895413
6. USC Trojans - 0.840680456
7. Alabama Crimson Tide - 0.836977074
8. Texas Longhorns - 0.814228245
9. Auburn Tigers - 0.804964719
10. Georgia Bulldogs - 0.804096482
11. Miami Hurricanes - 0.802098145
12. Penn State Nittany Lions - 0.799937765
13. LSU Tigers - 0.785530553
14. Virginia Tech Hokies - 0.783017531
15. Michigan Wolverines - 0.778081425
16. Tennessee Volunteers - 0.765869419
17. Notre Dame Fighting Irish - 0.758595071
18. Boise State Broncos - 0.755133235
19. Arkansas Razorbacks - 0.728979101
20. Oregon Ducks - 0.719754676
21. West Virginia Mountaineers - 0.718526855
22. Clemson Tigers - 0.713444416
23. Texas A&M Aggies - 0.694523954
24. BYU Cougars - 0.691782726
25. Wisconsin Badgers - 0.668514428
26. Texas Tech Red Raiders - 0.666169326
27. Iowa Hawkeyes - 0.65407483
28. UCLA Bruins - 0.652794606
29. Arizona State Sun Devils - 0.649783496
30. Michigan State Spartans - 0.649247099
31. Boston College Eagles - 0.643846793
32. Utah Utes - 0.63572054
33. South Carolina Gamecocks - 0.632864257
34. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets - 0.629444141
35. Washington Huskies - 0.617760963
36. Arizona Wildcats - 0.612486024
37. Oklahoma State Cowboys - 0.607924401
38. Pittsburgh Panthers - 0.607111993
39. California Golden Bears - 0.606785273
40. Colorado Buffaloes - 0.595759671
41. South Florida Bulls - 0.592458002
42. Missouri Tigers - 0.591600485
43. Stanford Cardinal - 0.587262087
44. TCU Horned Frogs - 0.583634636
45. North Carolina Tar Heels - 0.582215918
46. NC State Wolfpack - 0.581228487
47. Air Force Falcons - 0.572420461
48. Southern Miss Golden Eagles - 0.567464199
49. Maryland Terrapins - 0.557883519
50. Ole Miss Rebels - 0.556573655
51. Kansas State Wildcats - 0.555266129
52. Virginia Cavaliers - 0.549781226
53. Purdue Boilermakers - 0.542192429
54. Louisville Cardinals - 0.53369945
55. Fresno State Bulldogs - 0.531843416
56. Syracuse Orange - 0.528494823
57. Oregon State Beavers - 0.522156391
58. Mississippi State Bulldogs - 0.519760088
59. Kentucky Wildcats - 0.485927424
60. Cincinnati Bearcats - 0.481810836
61. Illinois Fighting Illini - 0.47817633
62. Hawaii Warriors - 0.475163753
63. Minnesota Golden Gophers - 0.472611243
64. Connecticut Huskies - 0.468503706
65. Kansas Jayhawks - 0.465797279
66. Washington State Cougars - 0.462478027
67. Houston Cougars - 0.460865066
68. ECU Pirates - 0.459828997
69. Nevada Wolf Pack - 0.441819138
70. Tulsa Golden Hurricane - 0.436051956
71. UCF Knights - 0.433037311
72. Troy Trojans - 0.430914266
73. San Diego State Aztecs - 0.429962234
74. Toledo Rockets - 0.421991261
75. Miami University RedHawks - 0.418206099
76. Bowling Green Falcons - 0.417769083
77. Rutgers Scarlet Knights - 0.415382917
78. Wake Forest Demon Deacons - 0.410930526
79. Marshall Thundering Herd - 0.409437841
80. Navy Midshipmen - 0.407287937
81. Colorado State Rams - 0.40511239
82. Baylor Bears - 0.401776931
83. Iowa State Cyclones - 0.390355926
84. Northwestern Wildcats - 0.380916867
85. Wyoming Cowboys - 0.369919336
86. Central Michigan Chippewas - 0.366696887
87. Northern Illinois Huskies - 0.362104358
88. Louisiana Tech Bulldogs - 0.360764786
89. Indiana Hoosiers - 0.352812358
90. Western Michigan Broncos - 0.351447592
91. Memphis Tigers - 0.33187297
92. New Mexico Lobos - 0.320421577
93. SMU Mustangs - 0.315621368
94. Vanderbilt Commodores - 0.305635634
95. Ball State Cardinals - 0.298320755
96. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders - 0.29394931
97. UAB Blazers - 0.27704403
98. Duke Blue Devils - 0.270186913
99. San Jose State Spartans - 0.267503718
100. Temple Owls - 0.267478244
101. Rice Owls - 0.265714865
102. Ohio Bobcats - 0.262889007
103. Tulane Green Wave - 0.245270835
104. Florida Atlantic Owls - 0.243387674
105. UTEP Miners - 0.241899019
106. Army Black Knights - 0.228890312
107. UNLV Rebels - 0.224073881
108. Utah State Aggies - 0.222073424
109. Louisiana-Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns - 0.195403074
110. North Texas Mean Green - 0.19382428
111. Akron Zips - 0.187159857
112. Arkansas State Red Wolves - 0.179803859
113. Idaho Vandals - 0.170898626
114. Louisiana-Monroe Warhawks - 0.16477316
115. Kent State Golden Flashes - 0.159658143
116. FIU Golden Panthers - 0.134867486
117. Buffalo Bulls - 0.129307436
118. Eastern Michigan Eagles - 0.129144898
119. New Mexico State Aggies - 0.123416506
120. Western Kentucky Hilltoppers - 0.10802521
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Friday, January 14, 2011
2010 Final Rankings
Congratulations to the Oregon Ducks! You are the Baggaley NCAA Football Ranking System National Champions for the 2010 Season. And before fans from Auburn cry foul, let us remind you that our rankings are based on an entire season performance, with all games weighted equally - meaning that Auburn's last second field goal victory over Oregon was not enough to overtake the difference in the overall season performance, especially some of Auburn's early-season games that were closer than they ought to have been against inferior competition. In fact, Auburn was not even able to overtake the TCU Horned Frogs who came in second. Here are the complete final rankings:
1. Oregon Ducks (12-1) - 1.2
2. TCU Horned Frogs (13-0) - 2.3
3. Auburn Tigers (14-0) - 3.0
4. Boise State Broncos (12-1) - 3.6
5. Stanford Cardinal (12-1) - 4.9
6. Ohio State Buckeyes (12-1) - 6.3
7. Alabama Crimson Tide (10-3) - 7.1
8. Wisconsin Badgers (11-2) - 8.3
9. LSU Tigers (11-2) - 9.9
10. Oklahoma State Cowboys (11-2) - 10.5
11. Nevada Wolf Pack (13-1) - 10.9
12. Oklahoma Sooners (12-2) - 11.6
13. Arkansas Razorbacks (10-3) - 11.8
14. Missouri Tigers (10-3) - 14.7
15. Virginia Tech Hokies (11-3) - 15.2
16. South Carolina Gamecocks (9-5) - 16.5
17. Florida State Seminoles (10-4) - 16.9
18. Texas A&M Aggies (9-4) - 18.5
19. Nebraska Cornhuskers (10-4) - 18.7
20. Michigan State Spartans (11-2) - 19.1
21. Utah Utes (10-3) - 21.6
22. Mississippi State Bulldogs (9-4) - 22.5
23. Air Force Falcons (9-4) - 23.8
24. Notre Dame Fighting Irish (8-5) - 24.1
25. Iowa Hawkeyes (8-5) - 25.3
26. NC State Wolfpack (9-4) - 26.1
27. San Diego State Aztecs (9-4) - 26.8
28. West Virginia Mountaineers (9-4) - 27.0
29. Pittsburgh Panthers (8-5) - 28.8
30. Florida Gators (7-5) - 30.5
31. Miami Hurricanes (7-6) - 32.6
32. Tulsa Golden Hurricane (10-3) - 32.7
33. UCF Knights (11-3) - 33.4
34. USC Trojans (8-5) - 34.5
35. Arizona Wildcats (7-6) - 36.0
36. Northern Illinois Huskies (11-3) - 36.3
37. Illinois Fighting Illini (7-6) - 36.7
38. Clemson Tigers (6-7) - 37.3
(tie) Hawaii Warriors (10-4) - 37.3
(tie) Maryland Terrapins (9-4) - 37.3
41. Navy Midshipmen (9-4) - 41.9
42. Georgia Bulldogs (6-6) - 42.4
43. Arizona State Sun Devils (6-6) - 43.0
44. Washington Huskies (7-6) - 44.0
45. North Carolina Tar Heels (8-5) - 45.7
46. Kansas State Wildcats (7-6) - 46.8
47. California Golden Bears (5-7) - 49.1
48. Michigan Wolverines (7-6) - 49.8
49. Louisville Cardinals (7-6) - 50.0
50. Oregon State Beavers (5-7) - 50.5
51. Southern Miss Golden Eagles (8-5) - 50.7
52. Penn State Nittany Lions (7-6) - 51.2
53. Iowa State Cyclones (5-7) - 53.8
54. Texas Tech Red Raiders (8-5) - 54.1
55. Boston College Eagles (7-6) - 55.3
56. South Florida Bulls (8-5) - 55.6
57. Texas Longhorns (5-7) - 56.7
58. Baylor Bears (7-6) - 58.6
(tie) BYU Cougars (7-6) - 58.6
60. Connecticut Huskies (8-5) - 58.7
61. Syracuse Orange (8-5) - 61.4
62. Tennessee Volunteers (6-7) - 62.3
63. Kentucky Wildcats (6-7) - 62.7
64. Colorado Buffaloes (5-7) - 65.3
65. Fresno State Bulldogs (8-5) - 65.8
66. Temple Owls (8-4) - 66.1
67. SMU Mustangs (7-7) - 69.0
68. Army Black Knights (7-6) - 69.4
69. Troy Trojans (8-5) - 70.2
70. Northwestern Wildcats (7-6) - 70.6
71. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (6-7) - 70.7
72. Toledo Rockets (8-5) - 71.2
73. ECU Pirates (6-7) - 72.2
(tie) Miami University RedHawks (10-4) - 72.2
75. Cincinnati Bearcats (4-8) - 73.6
76. UCLA Bruins (4-8) - 74.0
77. Houston Cougars (5-7) - 74.1
78. FIU Golden Panthers (7-6) - 76.9
79. Louisiana Tech Bulldogs (5-7) - 79.1
80. Ohio Bobcats (8-5) - 79.6
81. Western Michigan Broncos (6-6) - 79.7
82. Idaho Vandals (6-7) - 80.9
83. Virginia Cavaliers (4-8) - 83.5
84. Indiana Hoosiers (5-7) - 84.6
85. Purdue Boilermakers (4-8) - 85.1
86. Minnesota Golden Gophers (3-9) - 87.6
87. Duke Blue Devils (3-9) - 88.0
88. Marshall Thundering Herd (5-7) - 88.6
89. Rutgers Scarlet Knights (4-8) - 89.0
90. Arkansas State Red Wolves (4-8) - 91.0
91. Kent State Golden Flashes (5-7) - 91.1
92. UTEP Miners (6-7) - 92.0
93. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (3-9) - 92.1
94. UAB Blazers (4-8) - 93.1
95. Ole Miss Rebels (4-8) - 94.8
96. Washington State Cougars (2-10) - 95.6
97. Central Michigan Chippewas (3-9) - 96.7
98. Rice Owls (4-8) - 97.3
99. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders (6-7) - 98.0
100. Utah State Aggies (4-8) - 99.7
101. Louisiana-Monroe Warhawks (5-7) - 100.2
102. North Texas Mean Green (3-9) - 104.2
103. Colorado State Rams (3-9) - 104.9
104. Vanderbilt Commodores (2-10) - 105.0
105. Florida Atlantic Owls (4-8) - 105.3
106. Wyoming Cowboys (3-9) - 106.0
107. Bowling Green Falcons (2-10) - 106.2
108. Kansas Jayhawks (3-9) - 107.4
109. Ball State Cardinals (4-8) - 107.9
110. Western Kentucky Hilltoppers (2-10) - 109.1
111. Tulane Green Wave (4-8) - 109.3
112. Louisiana-Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns (3-9) - 111.2
113. UNLV Rebels (2-11) - 112.4
114. Memphis Tigers (1-11) - 113.8
115. Eastern Michigan Eagles (2-10) - 114.8
116. Akron Zips (1-11) - 116.4
117. Buffalo Bulls (2-10) - 116.7
118. San Jose State Spartans (1-12) - 118.4
119. New Mexico State Aggies (2-10) - 118.9
120. New Mexico Lobos (1-11) - 119.1
1. Oregon Ducks (12-1) - 1.2
2. TCU Horned Frogs (13-0) - 2.3
3. Auburn Tigers (14-0) - 3.0
4. Boise State Broncos (12-1) - 3.6
5. Stanford Cardinal (12-1) - 4.9
6. Ohio State Buckeyes (12-1) - 6.3
7. Alabama Crimson Tide (10-3) - 7.1
8. Wisconsin Badgers (11-2) - 8.3
9. LSU Tigers (11-2) - 9.9
10. Oklahoma State Cowboys (11-2) - 10.5
11. Nevada Wolf Pack (13-1) - 10.9
12. Oklahoma Sooners (12-2) - 11.6
13. Arkansas Razorbacks (10-3) - 11.8
14. Missouri Tigers (10-3) - 14.7
15. Virginia Tech Hokies (11-3) - 15.2
16. South Carolina Gamecocks (9-5) - 16.5
17. Florida State Seminoles (10-4) - 16.9
18. Texas A&M Aggies (9-4) - 18.5
19. Nebraska Cornhuskers (10-4) - 18.7
20. Michigan State Spartans (11-2) - 19.1
21. Utah Utes (10-3) - 21.6
22. Mississippi State Bulldogs (9-4) - 22.5
23. Air Force Falcons (9-4) - 23.8
24. Notre Dame Fighting Irish (8-5) - 24.1
25. Iowa Hawkeyes (8-5) - 25.3
26. NC State Wolfpack (9-4) - 26.1
27. San Diego State Aztecs (9-4) - 26.8
28. West Virginia Mountaineers (9-4) - 27.0
29. Pittsburgh Panthers (8-5) - 28.8
30. Florida Gators (7-5) - 30.5
31. Miami Hurricanes (7-6) - 32.6
32. Tulsa Golden Hurricane (10-3) - 32.7
33. UCF Knights (11-3) - 33.4
34. USC Trojans (8-5) - 34.5
35. Arizona Wildcats (7-6) - 36.0
36. Northern Illinois Huskies (11-3) - 36.3
37. Illinois Fighting Illini (7-6) - 36.7
38. Clemson Tigers (6-7) - 37.3
(tie) Hawaii Warriors (10-4) - 37.3
(tie) Maryland Terrapins (9-4) - 37.3
41. Navy Midshipmen (9-4) - 41.9
42. Georgia Bulldogs (6-6) - 42.4
43. Arizona State Sun Devils (6-6) - 43.0
44. Washington Huskies (7-6) - 44.0
45. North Carolina Tar Heels (8-5) - 45.7
46. Kansas State Wildcats (7-6) - 46.8
47. California Golden Bears (5-7) - 49.1
48. Michigan Wolverines (7-6) - 49.8
49. Louisville Cardinals (7-6) - 50.0
50. Oregon State Beavers (5-7) - 50.5
51. Southern Miss Golden Eagles (8-5) - 50.7
52. Penn State Nittany Lions (7-6) - 51.2
53. Iowa State Cyclones (5-7) - 53.8
54. Texas Tech Red Raiders (8-5) - 54.1
55. Boston College Eagles (7-6) - 55.3
56. South Florida Bulls (8-5) - 55.6
57. Texas Longhorns (5-7) - 56.7
58. Baylor Bears (7-6) - 58.6
(tie) BYU Cougars (7-6) - 58.6
60. Connecticut Huskies (8-5) - 58.7
61. Syracuse Orange (8-5) - 61.4
62. Tennessee Volunteers (6-7) - 62.3
63. Kentucky Wildcats (6-7) - 62.7
64. Colorado Buffaloes (5-7) - 65.3
65. Fresno State Bulldogs (8-5) - 65.8
66. Temple Owls (8-4) - 66.1
67. SMU Mustangs (7-7) - 69.0
68. Army Black Knights (7-6) - 69.4
69. Troy Trojans (8-5) - 70.2
70. Northwestern Wildcats (7-6) - 70.6
71. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (6-7) - 70.7
72. Toledo Rockets (8-5) - 71.2
73. ECU Pirates (6-7) - 72.2
(tie) Miami University RedHawks (10-4) - 72.2
75. Cincinnati Bearcats (4-8) - 73.6
76. UCLA Bruins (4-8) - 74.0
77. Houston Cougars (5-7) - 74.1
78. FIU Golden Panthers (7-6) - 76.9
79. Louisiana Tech Bulldogs (5-7) - 79.1
80. Ohio Bobcats (8-5) - 79.6
81. Western Michigan Broncos (6-6) - 79.7
82. Idaho Vandals (6-7) - 80.9
83. Virginia Cavaliers (4-8) - 83.5
84. Indiana Hoosiers (5-7) - 84.6
85. Purdue Boilermakers (4-8) - 85.1
86. Minnesota Golden Gophers (3-9) - 87.6
87. Duke Blue Devils (3-9) - 88.0
88. Marshall Thundering Herd (5-7) - 88.6
89. Rutgers Scarlet Knights (4-8) - 89.0
90. Arkansas State Red Wolves (4-8) - 91.0
91. Kent State Golden Flashes (5-7) - 91.1
92. UTEP Miners (6-7) - 92.0
93. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (3-9) - 92.1
94. UAB Blazers (4-8) - 93.1
95. Ole Miss Rebels (4-8) - 94.8
96. Washington State Cougars (2-10) - 95.6
97. Central Michigan Chippewas (3-9) - 96.7
98. Rice Owls (4-8) - 97.3
99. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders (6-7) - 98.0
100. Utah State Aggies (4-8) - 99.7
101. Louisiana-Monroe Warhawks (5-7) - 100.2
102. North Texas Mean Green (3-9) - 104.2
103. Colorado State Rams (3-9) - 104.9
104. Vanderbilt Commodores (2-10) - 105.0
105. Florida Atlantic Owls (4-8) - 105.3
106. Wyoming Cowboys (3-9) - 106.0
107. Bowling Green Falcons (2-10) - 106.2
108. Kansas Jayhawks (3-9) - 107.4
109. Ball State Cardinals (4-8) - 107.9
110. Western Kentucky Hilltoppers (2-10) - 109.1
111. Tulane Green Wave (4-8) - 109.3
112. Louisiana-Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns (3-9) - 111.2
113. UNLV Rebels (2-11) - 112.4
114. Memphis Tigers (1-11) - 113.8
115. Eastern Michigan Eagles (2-10) - 114.8
116. Akron Zips (1-11) - 116.4
117. Buffalo Bulls (2-10) - 116.7
118. San Jose State Spartans (1-12) - 118.4
119. New Mexico State Aggies (2-10) - 118.9
120. New Mexico Lobos (1-11) - 119.1
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Bowl Season
Our ranking system is not meant to be predictive. Instead, it is meant simply to rank teams by the success of their overall season. We'll be coming out with our post-bowl rankings soon, but first, we do annually take our rankings and use them in the ESPN and Yahoo bowl prediction contests, just to see how they measure up by using the rankings to a) predict the winner of each game - although we know there will be upsets, we "predict" that the favorite according to our ranking system will win each game, and b) assign "confidence points" to each game by using our ranking system to determine the likelihood of an upset and giving more points to the least likely upset - the likeliness of an upset determined by the difference in ranking of the two teams.
Using this simple system, once again, our rankings have proven to be reliable. Yes, 14 of the 35 games ended up as upsets according to our pre-bowl rankings. This is no surprise. Upsets happen every week in our ranking system. Plus, this system does not take into account team motivation - is the team disappointed by the bowl they ended up playing in? - or factors such as coaching changes. No, we did not win either of the contests we entered. There are many thousands of entries in each of these contests.
However, we did perform very well. How well? As expected, most of the upsets were between teams we had closely ranked, meaning we did not rate those games as being worth very many points, so most of the 21 games the system predicted correctly were high value games. Out of a possible 630 points, the ranking system scored 440 points, which is quite good. How good? It outperformed 96% of all entries in the Yahoo contest and 98% of all entries in the ESPN contest. The system especially performed well on games on or after New Years Day - or in other words the bowl games that appear most likely that both teams would be happy and motivated to be playing in. In fact, the system was only wrong on two games on or after New Years Day - both of which were rated very low in confidence points (1 point and 3 points respectively) and therefore are not considered surprising upsets in any sense. In fact, in one stretch, the system correctly picked 9 games in a row correctly, including all of the New Years Day bowl games.
What do we take from this? Not much. While the system seems to be based on a sound premise - the idea that teams with more successful regular seasons will typically perform better in the bowls as well - once again, this ranking system was not meant to be predictive. 14 of the 35 games still turned out to be upsets. But the system did seem to accurately reflect the likelihood of an upset in these bowl games based on the teams' performance during the regular season. Last year, one independent organization compared the BCS system computer rankings to bowl team performance and found that those computer rankings predicted only about half of the games correctly - roughly the same as you would expect if you picked the games by flipping a coin. Well, we outperformed that low standard. But that is no surprise. We feel like the premise of our ranking system is much more sound than any computer ranking system that is not allowed to take into account important aspects such as score differential in games. We do feel that these results tend to support the premise of our ranking system - just as they did last year.
But then again, we didn't think we really needed that justification in the first place. The results of our ranking system speak for themselves. Final rankings for the 2010 season coming soon. (Remember, Auburn was ranked behind TCU in the end of the regular season rankings.) Was the win over Oregon enough to push the Tigers past the Horned Frogs in the final rankings or will we award our national championship to a different team than this year's BCS/human polls? Stayed tuned and see...
Using this simple system, once again, our rankings have proven to be reliable. Yes, 14 of the 35 games ended up as upsets according to our pre-bowl rankings. This is no surprise. Upsets happen every week in our ranking system. Plus, this system does not take into account team motivation - is the team disappointed by the bowl they ended up playing in? - or factors such as coaching changes. No, we did not win either of the contests we entered. There are many thousands of entries in each of these contests.
However, we did perform very well. How well? As expected, most of the upsets were between teams we had closely ranked, meaning we did not rate those games as being worth very many points, so most of the 21 games the system predicted correctly were high value games. Out of a possible 630 points, the ranking system scored 440 points, which is quite good. How good? It outperformed 96% of all entries in the Yahoo contest and 98% of all entries in the ESPN contest. The system especially performed well on games on or after New Years Day - or in other words the bowl games that appear most likely that both teams would be happy and motivated to be playing in. In fact, the system was only wrong on two games on or after New Years Day - both of which were rated very low in confidence points (1 point and 3 points respectively) and therefore are not considered surprising upsets in any sense. In fact, in one stretch, the system correctly picked 9 games in a row correctly, including all of the New Years Day bowl games.
What do we take from this? Not much. While the system seems to be based on a sound premise - the idea that teams with more successful regular seasons will typically perform better in the bowls as well - once again, this ranking system was not meant to be predictive. 14 of the 35 games still turned out to be upsets. But the system did seem to accurately reflect the likelihood of an upset in these bowl games based on the teams' performance during the regular season. Last year, one independent organization compared the BCS system computer rankings to bowl team performance and found that those computer rankings predicted only about half of the games correctly - roughly the same as you would expect if you picked the games by flipping a coin. Well, we outperformed that low standard. But that is no surprise. We feel like the premise of our ranking system is much more sound than any computer ranking system that is not allowed to take into account important aspects such as score differential in games. We do feel that these results tend to support the premise of our ranking system - just as they did last year.
But then again, we didn't think we really needed that justification in the first place. The results of our ranking system speak for themselves. Final rankings for the 2010 season coming soon. (Remember, Auburn was ranked behind TCU in the end of the regular season rankings.) Was the win over Oregon enough to push the Tigers past the Horned Frogs in the final rankings or will we award our national championship to a different team than this year's BCS/human polls? Stayed tuned and see...
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
16-team Playoff
Everyone writes an article about what their playoff would look like if there actually were a playoff... Not to be left out, here is ours. We have chosen a model where the conference champion from each conference gets an automatic berth - yes, we know that means that most likely the best 16 teams will not be represented under this system, but we feel that a conference championship ought to be worth something. The other slots in the tournament are filled by at-large teams based on their rankings with no limit to how many teams from a single conference may be represented. That being said, here are our sixteen teams listed in order of their ranking in our analysis:
1. Oregon (PAC10)
2. TCU (MWC)
3. Auburn (SEC)
4. Boise State (WAC)
5. Ohio State (Big 10)
6. Stanford (At Large)
7. Wisconsin (At Large)
8. Alabama (At Large)
9. Nevada (At Large)
10. Virginia Tech (ACC)
11. Oklahoma (Big 12)
12. Arkansas (At Large)
13. UCF (CUSA)
14. Connecticut (Big East)
15. Miami (OH) (MAC)
16. FIU (Sun Belt)
1. Oregon (PAC10)
2. TCU (MWC)
3. Auburn (SEC)
4. Boise State (WAC)
5. Ohio State (Big 10)
6. Stanford (At Large)
7. Wisconsin (At Large)
8. Alabama (At Large)
9. Nevada (At Large)
10. Virginia Tech (ACC)
11. Oklahoma (Big 12)
12. Arkansas (At Large)
13. UCF (CUSA)
14. Connecticut (Big East)
15. Miami (OH) (MAC)
16. FIU (Sun Belt)
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Bowl Season 2010 - Which Matchups Are Most Intriguing?
To be analytical about this year's bowl matchups, we do need to define exactly what we mean by "most intriguing" since technically a matchup could be intriguing to someone because of a particular storyline or because the names of the two schools' mascots rhyme or any other reason really... What we mean when we say intriguing is which games are most likely to result in a close game between two very good teams based on their resume of games during the regular season? Naturally, this probably means that the BCS championship game will usually come in #1 on the list (although our analysis shows that one of the teams actually shouldn't be in this game). But where do the other games rank? See below... These games are ranked from least intriguing (#35) to most intriguing (#1).
35. GoDaddy.Com Bowl - #99 Mid. Tennessee vs. #77 Miami (OH)
34. Independence Bowl - #23 Air Force vs. #73 Georgia Tech
33. New Mexico Bowl - #69 BYU vs. #87 UTEP
32. Little Caesars Bowl - #82 FIU vs. #68 Toledo
31. New Orleans Bowl - #72 Ohio vs. #81 Troy
30. Fight Hunger Bowl - #9 Nevada vs. #58 Boston College
29. Fiesta Bowl - #57 Connecticut vs. #11 Oklahoma
28. Military Bowl - #66 ECU vs. #40 Maryland
27. TicketCity Bowl - #70 Northwestern vs. #53 Texas Tech
26. Holiday Bowl - #15 Nebraska vs. #56 Washington
25. Meineke Bowl - #61 South Florida vs. #31 Clemson
24. Pinstripe Bowl - #43 Kansas State vs. #65 Syracuse
23. BBVA Compass Bowl - #30 Pittsburgh vs. #59 Kentucky
22. Armed Forces Bowl - #71 Army vs. #67 SMU
21. Music City Bowl - #46 North Carolina vs. #62 Tennessee
20. Humanitarian Bowl - #42 Northern Illinois vs. #60 Fresno State
19. Beef 'O' Brady's Bowl - #48 Southern Miss vs. #54 Louisville
18. Texas Bowl - #38 Illinois vs. #49 Baylor
17. Gator Bowl - #27 Mississippi State vs. #45 Michigan
16. Outback Bowl - #34 Florida vs. #47 Penn State
15. Hawaii Bowl - #26 Hawaii vs. #41 Tulsa
14. Alamo Bowl - #14 Oklahoma State vs. #33 Arizona
13. Liberty Bowl - #39 Georgia vs. #32 UCF
12. Poinsettia Bowl - #36 Navy vs. #37 San Diego State
11. Sun Bowl - #24 Notre Dame vs. #29 Miami (FL)
10. Champs Sports Bowl - #22 West Virginia vs. #28 NC State
9. MAACO Las Vegas Bowl - #21 Utah vs. #4 Boise State
8. Insight Bowl - #13 Missouri vs. #24 Iowa
7. Capital One Bowl - #8 Alabama vs. #18 Michigan State
6. Chick-fil-A Bowl - #18 South Carolina vs. #20 Florida State
5. Cotton Bowl - #17 LSU vs. #16 Texas A&M
4. Sugar Bowl - #5 Ohio State vs. #12 Arkansas
3. Discover Orange Bowl - #6 Stanford vs. #10 Virginia Tech
2. Rose Bowl - #7 Wisconsin vs. #2 TCU
1. BCS Championship - #1 Oregon vs. #3 Auburn
35. GoDaddy.Com Bowl - #99 Mid. Tennessee vs. #77 Miami (OH)
34. Independence Bowl - #23 Air Force vs. #73 Georgia Tech
33. New Mexico Bowl - #69 BYU vs. #87 UTEP
32. Little Caesars Bowl - #82 FIU vs. #68 Toledo
31. New Orleans Bowl - #72 Ohio vs. #81 Troy
30. Fight Hunger Bowl - #9 Nevada vs. #58 Boston College
29. Fiesta Bowl - #57 Connecticut vs. #11 Oklahoma
28. Military Bowl - #66 ECU vs. #40 Maryland
27. TicketCity Bowl - #70 Northwestern vs. #53 Texas Tech
26. Holiday Bowl - #15 Nebraska vs. #56 Washington
25. Meineke Bowl - #61 South Florida vs. #31 Clemson
24. Pinstripe Bowl - #43 Kansas State vs. #65 Syracuse
23. BBVA Compass Bowl - #30 Pittsburgh vs. #59 Kentucky
22. Armed Forces Bowl - #71 Army vs. #67 SMU
21. Music City Bowl - #46 North Carolina vs. #62 Tennessee
20. Humanitarian Bowl - #42 Northern Illinois vs. #60 Fresno State
19. Beef 'O' Brady's Bowl - #48 Southern Miss vs. #54 Louisville
18. Texas Bowl - #38 Illinois vs. #49 Baylor
17. Gator Bowl - #27 Mississippi State vs. #45 Michigan
16. Outback Bowl - #34 Florida vs. #47 Penn State
15. Hawaii Bowl - #26 Hawaii vs. #41 Tulsa
14. Alamo Bowl - #14 Oklahoma State vs. #33 Arizona
13. Liberty Bowl - #39 Georgia vs. #32 UCF
12. Poinsettia Bowl - #36 Navy vs. #37 San Diego State
11. Sun Bowl - #24 Notre Dame vs. #29 Miami (FL)
10. Champs Sports Bowl - #22 West Virginia vs. #28 NC State
9. MAACO Las Vegas Bowl - #21 Utah vs. #4 Boise State
8. Insight Bowl - #13 Missouri vs. #24 Iowa
7. Capital One Bowl - #8 Alabama vs. #18 Michigan State
6. Chick-fil-A Bowl - #18 South Carolina vs. #20 Florida State
5. Cotton Bowl - #17 LSU vs. #16 Texas A&M
4. Sugar Bowl - #5 Ohio State vs. #12 Arkansas
3. Discover Orange Bowl - #6 Stanford vs. #10 Virginia Tech
2. Rose Bowl - #7 Wisconsin vs. #2 TCU
1. BCS Championship - #1 Oregon vs. #3 Auburn
Saturday, December 11, 2010
End of Regular Season Rankings - 2010
With today's Army and Navy game in the books, the regular season is finished. Here's how the rankings appear heading into bowl season:
1. Oregon Ducks (12-0) - 1.1
2. TCU Horned Frogs (12-0) - 2.0
3. Auburn Tigers (13-0) - 3.5
4. Boise State Broncos (11-1) - 3.6
5. Ohio State Buckeyes (11-1) - 5.2
6. Stanford Cardinal (11-1) - 6.8
7. Wisconsin Badgers (11-1) - 7.0
8. Alabama Crimson Tide (9-3) - 8.7
9. Nevada Wolf Pack (12-1) - 9.4
10. Virginia Tech Hokies (11-2) - 10.9
11. Oklahoma Sooners (11-2) - 11.0
12. Arkansas Razorbacks (10-2) - 12.1
13. Missouri Tigers (10-2) - 12.7
14. Oklahoma State Cowboys (10-2) - 12.8
15. Nebraska Cornhuskers (10-3) - 14.5
16. Texas A&M Aggies (9-3) - 16.5
17. LSU Tigers (10-2) - 17.0
18. Michigan State Spartans (11-1) - 17.8
(tie) South Carolina Gamecocks (9-4) - 17.8
20. Florida State Seminoles (9-4) - 19.9
21. Utah Utes (10-2) - 20.8
22. West Virginia Mountaineers (9-3) - 22.9
23. Air Force Falcons (8-4) - 23.8
24. Iowa Hawkeyes (7-5) - 25.0
(tie) Notre Dame Fighting Irish (7-5) - 25.0
26. Hawaii Warriors (10-3) - 26.7
27. Mississippi State Bulldogs (8-4) - 27.1
28. NC State Wolfpack (8-4) - 27.3
29. Miami Hurricanes (7-5) - 29.3
30. Pittsburgh Panthers (7-5) - 30.8
31. Clemson Tigers (6-6) - 32.2
32. UCF Knights (10-3) - 33.0
33. Arizona Wildcats (7-5) - 33.3
34. Florida Gators (6-5) - 34.0
35. USC Trojans (8-5) - 34.9
36. Navy Midshipmen (9-3) - 35.2
37. San Diego State Aztecs (8-4) - 36.5
38. Illinois Fighting Illini (6-6) - 38.5
39. Georgia Bulldogs (6-5) - 39.5
40. Maryland Terrapins (8-4) - 40.1
41. Tulsa Golden Hurricane (9-3) - 40.7
42. Northern Illinois Huskies (10-3) - 41.9
43. Arizona State Sun Devils (6-6) - 42.3
(tie) Kansas State Wildcats (7-5) - 42.3
45. Michigan Wolverines (7-5) - 44.5
46. North Carolina Tar Heels (7-5) - 46.8
47. Penn State Nittany Lions (7-5) - 47.8
48. Southern Miss Golden Eagles (8-4) - 48.7
49. Baylor Bears (7-5) - 49.9
50. California Golden Bears (5-7) - 51.4
51. Oregon State Beavers (5-7) - 52.3
52. Iowa State Cyclones (5-7) - 52.4
53. Texas Tech Red Raiders (7-5) - 53.1
54. Louisville Cardinals (6-6) - 53.4
55. Texas Longhorns (5-7) - 56.0
56. Washington Huskies (6-6) - 56.4
57. Connecticut Huskies (8-4) - 57.1
58. Boston College Eagles (7-5) - 57.7
59. Kentucky Wildcats (6-6) - 59.4
60. Fresno State Bulldogs (8-4) - 60.0
61. South Florida Bulls (7-5) - 61.5
62. Colorado Buffaloes (5-7) - 62.4
(tie) Tennessee Volunteers (6-6) - 62.4
64. Temple Owls (8-4) - 65.7
65. Syracuse Orange (7-5) - 66.7
66. ECU Pirates (6-6) - 67.4
67. SMU Mustangs (7-6) - 67.6
68. Toledo Rockets (8-4) - 67.7
69. BYU Cougars (6-6) - 68.3
70. Northwestern Wildcats (7-5) - 69.0
71. Army Black Knights (6-6) - 69.9
72. Ohio Bobcats (8-4) - 70.4
73. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (6-6) - 70.5
74. Houston Cougars (5-7) - 73.3
75. Cincinnati Bearcats (4-8) - 75.1
(tie) Miami University RedHawks (9-4) - 75.1
(tie) UCLA Bruins (4-8) - 75.1
78. Louisiana Tech Bulldogs (5-7) - 76.7
79. Western Michigan Broncos (6-6) - 78.7
80. Idaho Vandals (6-7) - 79.5
81. Troy Trojans (7-5) - 80.4
82. FIU Golden Panthers (6-6) - 80.9
83. Virginia Cavaliers (4-8) - 84.0
84. Indiana Hoosiers (5-7) - 84.4
85. Purdue Boilermakers (4-8) - 85.0
86. Marshall Thundering Herd (5-7) - 87.9
87. UTEP Miners (6-6) - 88.1
88. Duke Blue Devils (3-9) - 88.4
89. Minnesota Golden Gophers (3-9) - 88.6
90. Kent State Golden Flashes (5-7) - 90.2
91. Rutgers Scarlet Knights (4-8) - 90.7
92. Arkansas State Red Wolves (4-8) - 92.1
93. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (3-9) - 92.5
94. UAB Blazers (4-8) - 93.5
95. Ole Miss Rebels (4-8) - 95.0
96. Washington State Cougars (2-10) - 96.6
97. Central Michigan Chippewas (3-9) - 96.7
(tie) Rice Owls (4-8) - 96.7
99. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders (6-6) - 98.2
100. Utah State Aggies (4-8) - 100.1
101. Louisiana-Monroe Warhawks (5-7) - 100.5
102. North Texas Mean Green (3-9) - 104.6
103. Vanderbilt Commodores (2-10) - 104.8
104. Colorado State Rams (3-9) - 105.0
105. Bowling Green Falcons (2-10) - 105.4
106. Florida Atlantic Owls (4-8) - 106.0
107. Wyoming Cowboys (3-9) - 106.3
108. Kansas Jayhawks (3-9) - 106.6
109. Ball State Cardinals (4-8) - 107.7
110. Tulane Green Wave (4-8) - 108.4
111. Western Kentucky Hilltoppers (2-10) - 109.6
112. Louisiana-Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns (3-9) - 111.2
113. UNLV Rebels (2-11) - 112.6
114. Memphis Tigers (1-11) - 113.8
115. Eastern Michigan Eagles (2-10) - 114.8
116. Akron Zips (1-11) - 116.4
117. Buffalo Bulls (2-10) - 116.7
118. San Jose State Spartans (1-12) - 118.3
119. New Mexico State Aggies (2-10) - 118.8
120. New Mexico Lobos (1-11) - 119.3
1. Oregon Ducks (12-0) - 1.1
2. TCU Horned Frogs (12-0) - 2.0
3. Auburn Tigers (13-0) - 3.5
4. Boise State Broncos (11-1) - 3.6
5. Ohio State Buckeyes (11-1) - 5.2
6. Stanford Cardinal (11-1) - 6.8
7. Wisconsin Badgers (11-1) - 7.0
8. Alabama Crimson Tide (9-3) - 8.7
9. Nevada Wolf Pack (12-1) - 9.4
10. Virginia Tech Hokies (11-2) - 10.9
11. Oklahoma Sooners (11-2) - 11.0
12. Arkansas Razorbacks (10-2) - 12.1
13. Missouri Tigers (10-2) - 12.7
14. Oklahoma State Cowboys (10-2) - 12.8
15. Nebraska Cornhuskers (10-3) - 14.5
16. Texas A&M Aggies (9-3) - 16.5
17. LSU Tigers (10-2) - 17.0
18. Michigan State Spartans (11-1) - 17.8
(tie) South Carolina Gamecocks (9-4) - 17.8
20. Florida State Seminoles (9-4) - 19.9
21. Utah Utes (10-2) - 20.8
22. West Virginia Mountaineers (9-3) - 22.9
23. Air Force Falcons (8-4) - 23.8
24. Iowa Hawkeyes (7-5) - 25.0
(tie) Notre Dame Fighting Irish (7-5) - 25.0
26. Hawaii Warriors (10-3) - 26.7
27. Mississippi State Bulldogs (8-4) - 27.1
28. NC State Wolfpack (8-4) - 27.3
29. Miami Hurricanes (7-5) - 29.3
30. Pittsburgh Panthers (7-5) - 30.8
31. Clemson Tigers (6-6) - 32.2
32. UCF Knights (10-3) - 33.0
33. Arizona Wildcats (7-5) - 33.3
34. Florida Gators (6-5) - 34.0
35. USC Trojans (8-5) - 34.9
36. Navy Midshipmen (9-3) - 35.2
37. San Diego State Aztecs (8-4) - 36.5
38. Illinois Fighting Illini (6-6) - 38.5
39. Georgia Bulldogs (6-5) - 39.5
40. Maryland Terrapins (8-4) - 40.1
41. Tulsa Golden Hurricane (9-3) - 40.7
42. Northern Illinois Huskies (10-3) - 41.9
43. Arizona State Sun Devils (6-6) - 42.3
(tie) Kansas State Wildcats (7-5) - 42.3
45. Michigan Wolverines (7-5) - 44.5
46. North Carolina Tar Heels (7-5) - 46.8
47. Penn State Nittany Lions (7-5) - 47.8
48. Southern Miss Golden Eagles (8-4) - 48.7
49. Baylor Bears (7-5) - 49.9
50. California Golden Bears (5-7) - 51.4
51. Oregon State Beavers (5-7) - 52.3
52. Iowa State Cyclones (5-7) - 52.4
53. Texas Tech Red Raiders (7-5) - 53.1
54. Louisville Cardinals (6-6) - 53.4
55. Texas Longhorns (5-7) - 56.0
56. Washington Huskies (6-6) - 56.4
57. Connecticut Huskies (8-4) - 57.1
58. Boston College Eagles (7-5) - 57.7
59. Kentucky Wildcats (6-6) - 59.4
60. Fresno State Bulldogs (8-4) - 60.0
61. South Florida Bulls (7-5) - 61.5
62. Colorado Buffaloes (5-7) - 62.4
(tie) Tennessee Volunteers (6-6) - 62.4
64. Temple Owls (8-4) - 65.7
65. Syracuse Orange (7-5) - 66.7
66. ECU Pirates (6-6) - 67.4
67. SMU Mustangs (7-6) - 67.6
68. Toledo Rockets (8-4) - 67.7
69. BYU Cougars (6-6) - 68.3
70. Northwestern Wildcats (7-5) - 69.0
71. Army Black Knights (6-6) - 69.9
72. Ohio Bobcats (8-4) - 70.4
73. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (6-6) - 70.5
74. Houston Cougars (5-7) - 73.3
75. Cincinnati Bearcats (4-8) - 75.1
(tie) Miami University RedHawks (9-4) - 75.1
(tie) UCLA Bruins (4-8) - 75.1
78. Louisiana Tech Bulldogs (5-7) - 76.7
79. Western Michigan Broncos (6-6) - 78.7
80. Idaho Vandals (6-7) - 79.5
81. Troy Trojans (7-5) - 80.4
82. FIU Golden Panthers (6-6) - 80.9
83. Virginia Cavaliers (4-8) - 84.0
84. Indiana Hoosiers (5-7) - 84.4
85. Purdue Boilermakers (4-8) - 85.0
86. Marshall Thundering Herd (5-7) - 87.9
87. UTEP Miners (6-6) - 88.1
88. Duke Blue Devils (3-9) - 88.4
89. Minnesota Golden Gophers (3-9) - 88.6
90. Kent State Golden Flashes (5-7) - 90.2
91. Rutgers Scarlet Knights (4-8) - 90.7
92. Arkansas State Red Wolves (4-8) - 92.1
93. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (3-9) - 92.5
94. UAB Blazers (4-8) - 93.5
95. Ole Miss Rebels (4-8) - 95.0
96. Washington State Cougars (2-10) - 96.6
97. Central Michigan Chippewas (3-9) - 96.7
(tie) Rice Owls (4-8) - 96.7
99. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders (6-6) - 98.2
100. Utah State Aggies (4-8) - 100.1
101. Louisiana-Monroe Warhawks (5-7) - 100.5
102. North Texas Mean Green (3-9) - 104.6
103. Vanderbilt Commodores (2-10) - 104.8
104. Colorado State Rams (3-9) - 105.0
105. Bowling Green Falcons (2-10) - 105.4
106. Florida Atlantic Owls (4-8) - 106.0
107. Wyoming Cowboys (3-9) - 106.3
108. Kansas Jayhawks (3-9) - 106.6
109. Ball State Cardinals (4-8) - 107.7
110. Tulane Green Wave (4-8) - 108.4
111. Western Kentucky Hilltoppers (2-10) - 109.6
112. Louisiana-Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns (3-9) - 111.2
113. UNLV Rebels (2-11) - 112.6
114. Memphis Tigers (1-11) - 113.8
115. Eastern Michigan Eagles (2-10) - 114.8
116. Akron Zips (1-11) - 116.4
117. Buffalo Bulls (2-10) - 116.7
118. San Jose State Spartans (1-12) - 118.3
119. New Mexico State Aggies (2-10) - 118.8
120. New Mexico Lobos (1-11) - 119.3
Sunday, December 5, 2010
Week 14 - 2010
Go ahead and ask. How is it that we have TCU ranked ahead of Auburn? The short answer is that our ranking system takes into account the entire season and does not give greater weight to games played later in the year, which is what naturally happens in human polls and often in some computer-based ranking systems.
If you compare the entire seasons in this manner, especially if you remove artificial labels such as MWC, SEC or even team names, TCU really does show better when you look at game results. Auburn barely beat Mississippi State (#27 in our rankings), Clemson (#31) - an overtime game, and Kentucky (#59) in the first half of the season. None of these three teams are in the top 25 in our rankings. Granted, Auburn has been really good for the past 6 weeks, but that does not completely erase this early-season history in our analysis. TCU, meanwhile, had only one game closer than a touchdown (to San Diego State - ranked #36). TCU also blew out two teams in our top 25 (Utah at #21 and Air Force at #23). Auburn also has two "blow out" wins over top 25 teams (#12 Arkansas and #19 South Carolina) but it took playing South Carolina a second time to get that blowout victory.
This does not mean Auburn is not a great team, or that they wouldn't beat TCU if they played head-to-head. It just means that if you remove the biases associated with the names of teams played and the conferences teams played in and just compare the actual results, taking into account the year-long performance of these teams and the teams they played against, TCU has a slightly better resume of games overall.
Speaking of biases, since when would a previously undefeated team that has blown out nearly all of the opposition it has faced drop eight spots in the polls for losing an overtime game in the second-to-last game of the season to another top 10 team because of a two missed field goals - one at the end of regulation and one in overtime? If this were an SEC or Big 12 team, there is no reason that team would drop nearly completely out of the top 10. But because Boise State is in the WAC, voters treated them like they lost to a dog, nearly invalidating everything else they had accomplished that year. Nevada is no dog - itself having only lost one road game to a team that our analysis shows should be on the cusp of the Top 25 itself. Our analysis puts Nevada at #9 at the end of the regular season. And Boise State? They end the regular season at #4 - right about where we think the voters would have placed them if they had only been told the statistics of Boise State's season and opponents without the names and conference affiliations. Some teams get the benefit of the doubt because of decades of tradition. Others are penalized, not for anything about the actual season being evaluated, but for a lack of a lengthy tradition - even though those ghosts of the past used up their eligibility in the college game long ago.
Here are our regular season-ending rankings (technically with one more game to go - the traditional Army-Navy game scheduled for next week):
1. Oregon Ducks (12-0) - 1.1
2. TCU Horned Frogs (12-0) - 2.0
3. Auburn Tigers (13-0) - 3.5
4. Boise State Broncos (11-1) - 3.6
5. Ohio State Buckeyes (11-1) - 5.0
6. Stanford Cardinal (11-1) - 6.9
7. Wisconsin Badgers (11-1) - 7.0
8. Alabama Crimson Tide (9-3) - 8.7
9. Nevada Wolf Pack (12-1) - 9.5
10. Virginia Tech Hokies (11-2) - 10.9
11. Oklahoma Sooners (11-2) - 11.0
12. Arkansas Razorbacks (10-2) - 12.1
13. Missouri Tigers (10-2) - 12.7
14. Oklahoma State Cowboys (10-2) - 12.8
15. Nebraska Cornhuskers (10-3) - 14.5
16. Texas A&M Aggies (9-3) - 16.5
17. LSU Tigers (10-2) - 17.0
18. Michigan State Spartans (11-1) - 17.7
19. South Carolina Gamecocks (9-4) - 17.8
20. Florida State Seminoles (9-4) - 20.0
21. Utah Utes (10-2) - 20.8
22. West Virginia Mountaineers (9-3) - 22.8
23. Air Force Falcons (8-4) - 23.7
24. Iowa Hawkeyes (7-5) - 24.7
25. Notre Dame Fighting Irish (7-5) - 25.5
26. Hawaii Warriors (10-3) - 26.8
27. Mississippi State Bulldogs (8-4) - 26.9
28. NC State Wolfpack (8-4) - 27.3
29. Miami Hurricanes (7-5) - 29.2
30. Pittsburgh Panthers (7-5) - 30.7
31. Clemson Tigers (6-6) - 32.3
32. Arizona Wildcats (7-5) - 32.7
33. UCF Knights (10-3) - 33.3
34. Florida Gators (6-5) - 33.8
35. Arizona State Sun Devils (7-5) - 35.9
36. San Diego State Aztecs (8-4) - 36.3
37. Navy Midshipmen (8-3) - 37.2
38. USC Trojans (7-6) - 38.5
39. Illinois Fighting Illini (6-6) - 38.8
40. Georgia Bulldogs (6-5) - 39.8
41. Maryland Terrapins (8-4) - 40.9
42. Tulsa Golden Hurricane (9-3) - 41.0
43. Northern Illinois Huskies (10-3) - 41.7
44. Kansas State Wildcats (7-5) - 42.3
45. Michigan Wolverines (7-5) - 44.5
46. North Carolina Tar Heels (7-5) - 46.7
47. Penn State Nittany Lions (7-5) - 47.8
48. Southern Miss Golden Eagles (8-4) - 48.6
49. Baylor Bears (7-5) - 50.1
50. California Golden Bears (5-7) - 51.0
51. Oregon State Beavers (5-7) - 51.8
52. Iowa State Cyclones (5-7) - 52.8
53. Texas Tech Red Raiders (7-5) - 53.0
54. Louisville Cardinals (6-6) - 53.4
55. Texas Longhorns (5-7) - 56.1
56. Washington Huskies (6-6) - 56.5
57. Connecticut Huskies (8-4) - 57.1
58. Boston College Eagles (7-5) - 58.0
59. Kentucky Wildcats (6-6) - 59.5
60. Fresno State Bulldogs (8-4) - 60.2
61. South Florida Bulls (7-5) - 61.6
62. Colorado Buffaloes (5-7) - 62.4
63. Tennessee Volunteers (6-6) - 62.6
64. Temple Owls (8-4) - 65.6
65. Syracuse Orange (7-5) - 67.1
66. Army Black Knights (6-5) - 67.3
67. SMU Mustangs (7-6) - 67.7
(tie) Toledo Rockets (8-4) - 67.7
69. ECU Pirates (6-6) - 67.8
70. BYU Cougars (6-6) - 68.4
71. Northwestern Wildcats (7-5) - 69.2
72. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (6-6) - 70.6
73. Ohio Bobcats (8-4) - 70.7
74. Houston Cougars (5-7) - 73.5
75. Cincinnati Bearcats (4-8) - 75.0
76. UCLA Bruins (4-8) - 75.2
77. Miami University RedHawks (9-4) - 75.4
78. Louisiana Tech Bulldogs (5-7) - 77.0
79. Western Michigan Broncos (6-6) - 78.8
80. Idaho Vandals (6-7) - 79.5
81. Troy Trojans (7-5) - 80.2
82. FIU Golden Panthers (6-6) - 80.8
83. Indiana Hoosiers (5-7) - 84.1
84. Virginia Cavaliers (4-8) - 84.6
85. Purdue Boilermakers (4-8) - 85.0
86. Marshall Thundering Herd (5-7) - 87.9
(tie) UTEP Miners (6-6) - 87.9
88. Duke Blue Devils (3-9) - 88.5
89. Minnesota Golden Gophers (3-9) - 88.6
90. Kent State Golden Flashes (5-7) - 90.4
91. Rutgers Scarlet Knights (4-8) - 90.5
92. Arkansas State Red Wolves (4-8) - 92.1
93. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (3-9) - 92.8
94. UAB Blazers (4-8) - 93.5
95. Ole Miss Rebels (4-8) - 94.9
96. Washington State Cougars (2-10) - 96.3
97. Central Michigan Chippewas (3-9) - 96.8
(tie) Rice Owls (4-8) - 96.8
99. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders (6-6) - 98.1
100. Utah State Aggies (4-8) - 100.1
101. Louisiana-Monroe Warhawks (5-7) - 100.5
102. North Texas Mean Green (3-9) - 104.6
103. Vanderbilt Commodores (2-10) - 104.8
104. Colorado State Rams (3-9) - 105.0
105. Bowling Green Falcons (2-10) - 105.4
106. Florida Atlantic Owls (4-8) - 106.0
107. Wyoming Cowboys (3-9) - 106.3
108. Kansas Jayhawks (3-9) - 106.6
109. Ball State Cardinals (4-8) - 107.7
110. Tulane Green Wave (4-8) - 108.4
111. Western Kentucky Hilltoppers (2-10) - 109.6
112. Louisiana-Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns (3-9) - 111.2
113. UNLV Rebels (2-11) - 112.6
114. Memphis Tigers (1-11) - 113.8
115. Eastern Michigan Eagles (2-10) - 114.7
116. Akron Zips (1-11) - 116.5
117. Buffalo Bulls (2-10) - 116.7
118. San Jose State Spartans (1-12) - 118.3
119. New Mexico State Aggies (2-10) - 118.9
120. New Mexico Lobos (1-11) - 119.2
If you compare the entire seasons in this manner, especially if you remove artificial labels such as MWC, SEC or even team names, TCU really does show better when you look at game results. Auburn barely beat Mississippi State (#27 in our rankings), Clemson (#31) - an overtime game, and Kentucky (#59) in the first half of the season. None of these three teams are in the top 25 in our rankings. Granted, Auburn has been really good for the past 6 weeks, but that does not completely erase this early-season history in our analysis. TCU, meanwhile, had only one game closer than a touchdown (to San Diego State - ranked #36). TCU also blew out two teams in our top 25 (Utah at #21 and Air Force at #23). Auburn also has two "blow out" wins over top 25 teams (#12 Arkansas and #19 South Carolina) but it took playing South Carolina a second time to get that blowout victory.
This does not mean Auburn is not a great team, or that they wouldn't beat TCU if they played head-to-head. It just means that if you remove the biases associated with the names of teams played and the conferences teams played in and just compare the actual results, taking into account the year-long performance of these teams and the teams they played against, TCU has a slightly better resume of games overall.
Speaking of biases, since when would a previously undefeated team that has blown out nearly all of the opposition it has faced drop eight spots in the polls for losing an overtime game in the second-to-last game of the season to another top 10 team because of a two missed field goals - one at the end of regulation and one in overtime? If this were an SEC or Big 12 team, there is no reason that team would drop nearly completely out of the top 10. But because Boise State is in the WAC, voters treated them like they lost to a dog, nearly invalidating everything else they had accomplished that year. Nevada is no dog - itself having only lost one road game to a team that our analysis shows should be on the cusp of the Top 25 itself. Our analysis puts Nevada at #9 at the end of the regular season. And Boise State? They end the regular season at #4 - right about where we think the voters would have placed them if they had only been told the statistics of Boise State's season and opponents without the names and conference affiliations. Some teams get the benefit of the doubt because of decades of tradition. Others are penalized, not for anything about the actual season being evaluated, but for a lack of a lengthy tradition - even though those ghosts of the past used up their eligibility in the college game long ago.
Here are our regular season-ending rankings (technically with one more game to go - the traditional Army-Navy game scheduled for next week):
1. Oregon Ducks (12-0) - 1.1
2. TCU Horned Frogs (12-0) - 2.0
3. Auburn Tigers (13-0) - 3.5
4. Boise State Broncos (11-1) - 3.6
5. Ohio State Buckeyes (11-1) - 5.0
6. Stanford Cardinal (11-1) - 6.9
7. Wisconsin Badgers (11-1) - 7.0
8. Alabama Crimson Tide (9-3) - 8.7
9. Nevada Wolf Pack (12-1) - 9.5
10. Virginia Tech Hokies (11-2) - 10.9
11. Oklahoma Sooners (11-2) - 11.0
12. Arkansas Razorbacks (10-2) - 12.1
13. Missouri Tigers (10-2) - 12.7
14. Oklahoma State Cowboys (10-2) - 12.8
15. Nebraska Cornhuskers (10-3) - 14.5
16. Texas A&M Aggies (9-3) - 16.5
17. LSU Tigers (10-2) - 17.0
18. Michigan State Spartans (11-1) - 17.7
19. South Carolina Gamecocks (9-4) - 17.8
20. Florida State Seminoles (9-4) - 20.0
21. Utah Utes (10-2) - 20.8
22. West Virginia Mountaineers (9-3) - 22.8
23. Air Force Falcons (8-4) - 23.7
24. Iowa Hawkeyes (7-5) - 24.7
25. Notre Dame Fighting Irish (7-5) - 25.5
26. Hawaii Warriors (10-3) - 26.8
27. Mississippi State Bulldogs (8-4) - 26.9
28. NC State Wolfpack (8-4) - 27.3
29. Miami Hurricanes (7-5) - 29.2
30. Pittsburgh Panthers (7-5) - 30.7
31. Clemson Tigers (6-6) - 32.3
32. Arizona Wildcats (7-5) - 32.7
33. UCF Knights (10-3) - 33.3
34. Florida Gators (6-5) - 33.8
35. Arizona State Sun Devils (7-5) - 35.9
36. San Diego State Aztecs (8-4) - 36.3
37. Navy Midshipmen (8-3) - 37.2
38. USC Trojans (7-6) - 38.5
39. Illinois Fighting Illini (6-6) - 38.8
40. Georgia Bulldogs (6-5) - 39.8
41. Maryland Terrapins (8-4) - 40.9
42. Tulsa Golden Hurricane (9-3) - 41.0
43. Northern Illinois Huskies (10-3) - 41.7
44. Kansas State Wildcats (7-5) - 42.3
45. Michigan Wolverines (7-5) - 44.5
46. North Carolina Tar Heels (7-5) - 46.7
47. Penn State Nittany Lions (7-5) - 47.8
48. Southern Miss Golden Eagles (8-4) - 48.6
49. Baylor Bears (7-5) - 50.1
50. California Golden Bears (5-7) - 51.0
51. Oregon State Beavers (5-7) - 51.8
52. Iowa State Cyclones (5-7) - 52.8
53. Texas Tech Red Raiders (7-5) - 53.0
54. Louisville Cardinals (6-6) - 53.4
55. Texas Longhorns (5-7) - 56.1
56. Washington Huskies (6-6) - 56.5
57. Connecticut Huskies (8-4) - 57.1
58. Boston College Eagles (7-5) - 58.0
59. Kentucky Wildcats (6-6) - 59.5
60. Fresno State Bulldogs (8-4) - 60.2
61. South Florida Bulls (7-5) - 61.6
62. Colorado Buffaloes (5-7) - 62.4
63. Tennessee Volunteers (6-6) - 62.6
64. Temple Owls (8-4) - 65.6
65. Syracuse Orange (7-5) - 67.1
66. Army Black Knights (6-5) - 67.3
67. SMU Mustangs (7-6) - 67.7
(tie) Toledo Rockets (8-4) - 67.7
69. ECU Pirates (6-6) - 67.8
70. BYU Cougars (6-6) - 68.4
71. Northwestern Wildcats (7-5) - 69.2
72. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (6-6) - 70.6
73. Ohio Bobcats (8-4) - 70.7
74. Houston Cougars (5-7) - 73.5
75. Cincinnati Bearcats (4-8) - 75.0
76. UCLA Bruins (4-8) - 75.2
77. Miami University RedHawks (9-4) - 75.4
78. Louisiana Tech Bulldogs (5-7) - 77.0
79. Western Michigan Broncos (6-6) - 78.8
80. Idaho Vandals (6-7) - 79.5
81. Troy Trojans (7-5) - 80.2
82. FIU Golden Panthers (6-6) - 80.8
83. Indiana Hoosiers (5-7) - 84.1
84. Virginia Cavaliers (4-8) - 84.6
85. Purdue Boilermakers (4-8) - 85.0
86. Marshall Thundering Herd (5-7) - 87.9
(tie) UTEP Miners (6-6) - 87.9
88. Duke Blue Devils (3-9) - 88.5
89. Minnesota Golden Gophers (3-9) - 88.6
90. Kent State Golden Flashes (5-7) - 90.4
91. Rutgers Scarlet Knights (4-8) - 90.5
92. Arkansas State Red Wolves (4-8) - 92.1
93. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (3-9) - 92.8
94. UAB Blazers (4-8) - 93.5
95. Ole Miss Rebels (4-8) - 94.9
96. Washington State Cougars (2-10) - 96.3
97. Central Michigan Chippewas (3-9) - 96.8
(tie) Rice Owls (4-8) - 96.8
99. Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders (6-6) - 98.1
100. Utah State Aggies (4-8) - 100.1
101. Louisiana-Monroe Warhawks (5-7) - 100.5
102. North Texas Mean Green (3-9) - 104.6
103. Vanderbilt Commodores (2-10) - 104.8
104. Colorado State Rams (3-9) - 105.0
105. Bowling Green Falcons (2-10) - 105.4
106. Florida Atlantic Owls (4-8) - 106.0
107. Wyoming Cowboys (3-9) - 106.3
108. Kansas Jayhawks (3-9) - 106.6
109. Ball State Cardinals (4-8) - 107.7
110. Tulane Green Wave (4-8) - 108.4
111. Western Kentucky Hilltoppers (2-10) - 109.6
112. Louisiana-Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns (3-9) - 111.2
113. UNLV Rebels (2-11) - 112.6
114. Memphis Tigers (1-11) - 113.8
115. Eastern Michigan Eagles (2-10) - 114.7
116. Akron Zips (1-11) - 116.5
117. Buffalo Bulls (2-10) - 116.7
118. San Jose State Spartans (1-12) - 118.3
119. New Mexico State Aggies (2-10) - 118.9
120. New Mexico Lobos (1-11) - 119.2
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)